“They Didn’t Hate Him — They Measured Him: How German Generals Saw Montgomery Coming, Step by Step, Until War Became a Matter of Waiting”
The war was over, but the habits of war lingered.
In a gray interrogation room somewhere in occupied Germany, chairs scraped softly against the floor. The air still smelled faintly of smoke and damp concrete. Outside, Europe was a continent of ruins learning how to breathe again. Inside, history was about to speak—not in speeches, not in documents, but in a gesture.
Captain B. H. Liddell Hart, notebook open, asked a defeated German general a simple question.
“What did you think of Field Marshal Montgomery?”
The man across from him was Günther Blumentritt, former chief of staff to Gerd von Rundstedt, one of the architects of Germany’s defense against the Allied invasion of Western Europe.
Blumentritt did not answer.
Instead, he stood up.
Slowly. Deliberately.
He began to walk across the room, placing one foot carefully in front of the other. He looked down, as if the floor itself might betray him—checking for cracks, for traps, for anything unexpected. Each step was cautious, measured, inevitable.
Then he stopped. Turned. And said:
“He moved like this.”
That was the answer.
A German general, defeated, captured, calmly mocking his conqueror—not with contempt, but with accuracy. In that silent walk was everything the Wehrmacht had learned about Bernard Montgomery across three years of war.
And what they learned was this:
Montgomery was never a mystery.
I. Predictable Is Not a Compliment
When German commanders spoke of Montgomery, they used words that sounded harmless—almost respectful.
Systematic.
Methodical.
Careful.
To the British public, those words became virtues. To soldiers exhausted by years of disaster, they felt like salvation. But to German generals raised on speed, initiative, and operational surprise, they meant something else entirely.
They meant predictability.
Rundstedt himself described Montgomery precisely: “Very systematic. That is all right if you have sufficient forces and sufficient time.”
It was not praise.
It was diagnosis.
A predictable enemy is an enemy you can plan for. You know where he will attack. You know when he will attack. You know how he will do it. You can prepare defenses accordingly. You can trade space for time. You can survive.
This raises an uncomfortable question that Allied histories often avoid:
If Montgomery was so predictable, why couldn’t the Germans stop him?
The answer lies not in brilliance—but in trauma.
II. The Ghosts of the Somme
Montgomery was not just fighting Germans.
He was fighting ghosts.
The British Army that entered the Second World War carried a psychological wound that never healed: the First World War. The Somme. Passchendaele. Entire generations fed into machine guns by commanders who believed courage could overcome artillery.
Montgomery had lived that war.
He had watched what recklessness cost. And he made a vow—never written, never announced—that no British army under his command would be destroyed in a gamble.
Speed could kill armies.
Surprise could fail.
But preparation, firepower, and control—that could keep an army alive.
The Germans understood this instinctively when Montgomery arrived in North Africa.
III. North Africa: The Birth of the Steamroller
By mid-1942, British forces in North Africa had been pushed back repeatedly by Erwin Rommel. Rommel’s Afrika Korps had become legend—fast, aggressive, always striking where least expected.
Then Montgomery arrived.
And he did something that baffled everyone.
He refused to attack.
For seven weeks at El Alamein, he waited. While Churchill raged from London, Montgomery built up strength. He refused to be rushed. He waited until he had overwhelming superiority—men, tanks, aircraft.
When he finally attacked, it was not elegant. It was not fast.
It was crushing.
The Germans recognized immediately what kind of war this was. Friedrich von Mellenthin later described it as Materialschlacht—a battle of material. A war of attrition.
It was the one kind of war Germany could not win.
Montgomery did not outmaneuver Rommel. He outlasted him.
And from that moment, the pattern was set.
IV. When Victory Wasn’t Enough
After halting Rommel at Alam Halfa, Montgomery faced a choice. Rommel’s forces were exhausted, short of fuel, retreating.
Many commanders would have pursued.
Montgomery refused.
He consolidated. He regrouped. He let the enemy escape.
German officers watching this unfold were stunned. They could not believe the British were allowing them to withdraw, reorganize, and live to fight again.
But Montgomery was not trying to annihilate the enemy.
He was trying to avoid disaster.
This was not cowardice.
It was philosophy.
Montgomery accepted something painful: the British Army was not built for mobile warfare. So he reshaped it into something else—an army that advanced slowly, deliberately, under massive firepower, minimizing surprises.
The Germans adjusted.
They always knew what was coming.
V. Respect Without Fear
When American forces entered the war, the Germans encountered something different.
Blumentritt, who had faced both British and American commanders, did not hesitate when asked who the most dangerous Allied general was.
It was not Montgomery.
It was George S. Patton.
Patton was initiative incarnate. He moved fast, changed direction without warning, struck where intelligence said he could not possibly be. Against Patton, German planners had to hold reserves back because they never knew where the blow would land.
Against Montgomery, they did not.
The Germans respected Montgomery.
They feared Patton.
That difference would shape the war.
VI. Normandy and the Illusion of Control
Before D-Day, Allied planners exploited German fear brilliantly.
Through Operation Fortitude, they created a phantom army group supposedly commanded by Patton. The Germans believed it completely. Entire divisions sat idle at Pas-de-Calais, waiting for an attack that never came.
Why?
Because they could not imagine Patton being wasted on a diversion.
That miscalculation helped doom Germany.
But once Normandy was secured, Montgomery returned to form.
VII. Goodwood: Precision Without Adaptation
Operation Goodwood was meant to break out from Normandy. Nearly 900 British tanks advanced behind massive bombardment.
From a German perspective, it was terrifying—and then revealing.
Hans von Luck watched British tanks advance in dense formations, straight lines, no infantry support. When resistance appeared, they stopped.
They did not maneuver.
They waited.
Goodwood cost over 400 tanks. The breakthrough never came.
To German officers, it confirmed everything they believed: Montgomery’s army followed plans, not opportunities.
VIII. Market Garden: When Caution Tried to Be Bold
In September 1944, Montgomery attempted something uncharacteristic—Operation Market Garden.
For once, he gambled.
The Germans were stunned at first. Then they captured Allied plans.
One road. One axis. No flexibility.
Walter Model understood immediately. Contain the airborne troops. Cut the road. Montgomery would not improvise.
And he didn’t.
30th Corps advanced at what Germans called “the Montgomery pace.” When resistance appeared, they stopped. At night, they halted.
For the paratroopers at Arnhem, that slowness was fatal.
Market Garden failed—and in German eyes, it proved the rule.
IX. The Bulge: Control Versus Chaos
During the Battle of the Bulge, the contrast became absolute.
Patton turned his army ninety degrees in two days and struck the German flank.
Montgomery, given command in the north, stabilized the lines. He withdrew exposed units, tidied the front, froze the situation.
German commanders were relieved.
They knew nothing unexpected would happen there.
Montgomery had denied them defeat—but also denied surprise.
X. The Aftertaste
Montgomery never lost an army.
He never suffered catastrophic defeat.
The Germans respected him because he was reliable, disciplined, and impossible to panic.
But war is not won by respect.
It is ended by fear.
The Germans could see Montgomery coming.
They could prepare.
They could endure.
Against Patton, they could not.
And in the quiet walk across that interrogation room, Blumentritt captured a truth that victory speeches never would:
Montgomery was the general you wanted if you feared disaster more than delay.
Patton was the general you wanted if you needed the war to end.
The Germans knew the difference.
